> However ‘A week at the knees’ is technically more sophisticated in every way. It also offers a more immersive experiences for audiences, who can walk directly beneath and behind the sculpture, enjoying it from multiple angles.
I'm inclined to agree, esp since this is in a park. That said, the article suggests it's part of festival and is just a temporary exhibit, so I don't think any trees were sacrificed for the sake of overly precious architectural fantasies.
The windows on this were extremely impressive to me. That is, I feel like this would have been way easier if all the windows were just on flat sections, but one set of windows have about their bottom third on the bottom curve, meaning he had to fabricate curved window frames and curved window panes, which seems really difficult to me. He could have easily "cheated" and put those windows just a tad higher so they were fully on the vertical back wall. Making them with that curve just shows a crazy attention to detail and really added to the illusion of the brick sculpture feeling like a flexible rug.
While fun I always feel that grass and trees are basically always nicer than this kind of thing.
It feels like a human imposition on nature, that we decide that we are to have this brick thing here, instead of whatever grew there.
Maybe if it were a tunnel it would be okay.
It is a tunnel, you can walk through it.
> However ‘A week at the knees’ is technically more sophisticated in every way. It also offers a more immersive experiences for audiences, who can walk directly beneath and behind the sculpture, enjoying it from multiple angles.
https://fadmagazine.com/2025/05/20/a-week-at-the-knees-alex-...
Yes, but what I meant by a tunnel is that a tunnel doesn't take away surface space whereas this does.
I’m not sure what you mean, like an underground tunnel?
Yes.
Then how would you see the artwork?
I'm inclined to agree, esp since this is in a park. That said, the article suggests it's part of festival and is just a temporary exhibit, so I don't think any trees were sacrificed for the sake of overly precious architectural fantasies.
This is an urban square in the middle of London, not a nature park. There hasn't been a natural landscape here for thousands of years.
You are missing the trees for the forest.
It's only there for a month.
How about houses? I live in one. Maybe you do too. Are those an imposition?
If they are, surely they're a bigger one.
To some degree, yes. But we also need them. They aren't just decoration or something to satisfy our desire to build.
What about an art museum whose purpose is to provide a place to show and view art? What about a concert venue?
[dead]
The windows on this were extremely impressive to me. That is, I feel like this would have been way easier if all the windows were just on flat sections, but one set of windows have about their bottom third on the bottom curve, meaning he had to fabricate curved window frames and curved window panes, which seems really difficult to me. He could have easily "cheated" and put those windows just a tad higher so they were fully on the vertical back wall. Making them with that curve just shows a crazy attention to detail and really added to the illusion of the brick sculpture feeling like a flexible rug.
I wanna play this skateboarding game. :)
[dead]
More money than sense.
In the UK is it more money than pense? (a play on pensive)
Personally, I think it's OK, and maybe even good, if sometimes humans do things for aesthetic purposes instead of paperclip optimization.
[flagged]