One of the examples offered as outrageous is that people on meta are now allowed to say
- "Trans people are immoral"
It's not something I agree with, but any hardline christian or muslim would take that position quite easily. And that's not a small portion of the world population (easily > 1 billion).
Is it not better that they can say that, and hence a discussion can be had. And if no discussion arises, at the very least people make their positions clear, and we know who stands where.
The Utopia the intercept (and previous policy) seemed to desire was that we just pretended this was not a position people held, and it would somehow magically go away.
Providing community notes and overt information seems far far better than covert censoring.
The problem with covert censoring is twofold: a) people get an insanely distorted perception of what average people think and b) sometimes the people in power doing the censoring are wrong (e.g., the censorship of the hunter biden laptop story as fake news). Overtly correcting false narratives via community notes evades both of these issues.
One of the examples offered as outrageous is that people on meta are now allowed to say
- "Trans people are immoral"
It's not something I agree with, but any hardline christian or muslim would take that position quite easily. And that's not a small portion of the world population (easily > 1 billion).
Is it not better that they can say that, and hence a discussion can be had. And if no discussion arises, at the very least people make their positions clear, and we know who stands where.
The Utopia the intercept (and previous policy) seemed to desire was that we just pretended this was not a position people held, and it would somehow magically go away.
Providing community notes and overt information seems far far better than covert censoring.
The problem with covert censoring is twofold: a) people get an insanely distorted perception of what average people think and b) sometimes the people in power doing the censoring are wrong (e.g., the censorship of the hunter biden laptop story as fake news). Overtly correcting false narratives via community notes evades both of these issues.
Is anyone else reporting this, or is there a link to the purported document which doesn't require supplying an email address to The Intercept?